Mailing-List: contact c-users-help@xerces.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: c-users@xerces.apache.org
Message-ID: <437E8B26.3030706@apache.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 18:17:10 -0800
From: David Bertoni <dbertoni@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: c-users@xerces.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can the Makefile be changed to compile directly only one library
 named libxerces-c.so ?
References: <75A70F733E36B648A492A827EFA3B840A66AF0@lisi053a.siemens.pt>
In-Reply-To: <75A70F733E36B648A492A827EFA3B840A66AF0@lisi053a.siemens.pt>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Rafael Sousa (Ext_Altior) wrote:
> Hi David!
> 
> But do you think that changing the Makefiles by hand so that the
> resulting lib is directly named libxerces-c.so, and not
> libxerces-c.so.27.0, will solve my problem, i.e., I will no longer get
> these kind of errors that ask for libxerces-c.so.27 ?
> 
> By the way, my platform is Solaris.
> 

It's probably easier for you to just modify the Solaris-specifc section 
of src/xercesc/Makefile.incl to modify the LD_SONAME variable.  You can 
change the following:

   LD_SONAME = -h ${SO_NAME}

to:

   LD_SONAME = -h libxerces-c.so

Note that you should be very careful about doing this is you plan to 
distribute your binary, or you expect it to work correctly on a system 
that has multiple versions of Xerces-C on it.

Dave