Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact xerces-c-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list xerces-c-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 22799 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2001 14:52:42 -0000 Received: from nycsmtp1fb.rdc-nyc.rr.com (HELO nyc.rr.com) (24.29.99.76) by h31.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 4 Feb 2001 14:52:42 -0000 Received: (apparently) from jungle1 ([24.168.138.170]) by nyc.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.357.35); Sun, 4 Feb 2001 09:54:00 -0500 Message-ID: <000c01c08eba$163cf9d0$aa8aa818@jungle1> From: "Jonathan Pierce" To: References: Subject: Re: Bugs and Compile Problems in 1.4.0 Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 09:52:23 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N > Not much point in replacing with if you're going > to drag the entire std namespace back in. The whole point of > is to provide safer/more precise control over which names were assumed > to come from the std namespace. > I realize that it has equivalent meaning. The issue was whether to allow or require this syntax at all in common files. The argument against it is that some platforms might not support it yet so those platforms won't be able to compile the common files if the style is used. Jonathan