Mailing-List: contact repository-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: repository@apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of brianf@reply.infinity.nu
 designates 205.210.42.66 as permitted sender)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: M2 repo error
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 15:07:46 -0400
Message-ID: <2BABBE7D2A66E04DB8A66A527D29927E53C1DF@intrepid.infinity.nu>
In-Reply-To: <FF6CC3F4-A7C6-4A8B-ACC3-10E03F30599D@Sun.COM>
Thread-Topic: M2 repo error
Thread-Index: AcmyXrTrhiM09j0aSE2l4f/Spby4TAAnmC1g
References: <200903160915.57895.andy@datanucleus.org>
 <ED23EB78-DC0C-4E3E-AD2D-753CD60BD117@SUN.com>
 <B5B55634-2700-4F7E-8A7E-92C77E6502A3@SUN.com>
 <1a5b6c410903200917j49a9aa88tc905e9ebfe4fbbc6@mail.gmail.com>
 <FF6CC3F4-A7C6-4A8B-ACC3-10E03F30599D@Sun.COM>
From: "Brian E. Fox" <brianf@reply.infinity.nu>
To: <repository@apache.org>,
	"Carlos Sanchez" <carlos@apache.org>
Cc: "Apache JDO project" <jdo-dev@db.apache.org>

Shouldn't the jdo artifacts come to central directly from Sun?

-----Original Message-----
From: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM [mailto:Craig.Russell@Sun.COM]=20
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:13 PM
To: Carlos Sanchez
Cc: repository@apache.org; Apache JDO project
Subject: Re: M2 repo error

Hi Carlos,

Can you please take a look at people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-=20
repository/javax/jdo and verify that these artifacts (maven-=20
metadata.xml, signature, checksum) look correct? If so, please push =20
them to ibiblio.

There should be only three versions: 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2.

Thanks,

Craig

On Mar 20, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:

> Maybe you haven't got my message:
>
> It may have been auto generated at some point.
> If you use Maven 2 it will be generated.
> You can override it by putting a new one under
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/ (and
> letting me know to setup an automatic sync)
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Craig L Russell
<Craig.Russell@sun.com=20
> > wrote:
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> Craig
>>
>> On Mar 16, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I don't recall pushing this artifact to the repository; is it
>>> auto-generated perhaps?
>>>
>>> Any help in fixing it would be appreciated.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Craig
>>>
>>> still a mvn newbie
>>>
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>
>>>> From: Andy Jefferson <andy@datanucleus.org>
>>>> Date: March 16, 2009 2:15:57 AM PDT
>>>> To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>> Subject: M2 repo error
>>>> Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>>
>>>> On
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/
>>>> there is a file
>>>>
>>>>
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/javax/jdo/jdo2-api/maven-m
etadata.xml
>>>> which is presumably used by Maven(2) in determining what versions =20
>>>> it is
>>>> prepared to let the world know about. There is no 2.2 entry in =20
>>>> it, nor
>>>> 2.1
>>>> for that matter.
>>>>
>>>> Means that whenever anyone specifies to use "apache-jdo"
>>>> (javax.jdo/jdo2-api)
>>>> between 2.2 and 3.0 they get the really informative
>>>>
>>>> Couldn't find a version in [SNAPSHOT, 2.0-beta, 2.0-rc1, 2.0,
>>>> 2.1-SNAPSHOT] to
>>>> match range [2.2,3.0)
>>>> javax.jdo:jdo2-api:jar:null
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps there's someone who can fix this ?
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> --
>>>> Andy  (DataNucleus - http://www.datanucleus.org)
>>>
>>> Craig L Russell
>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>
>>
>> Craig L Russell
>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>>

Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!