Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-repository-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 915 invoked from network); 23 May 2008 04:25:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 May 2008 04:25:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 84779 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2008 04:25:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-repository-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 84748 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2008 04:25:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact repository-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: repository@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list repository@apache.org Received: (qmail 84737 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2008 04:25:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 May 2008 21:25:02 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [210.50.30.235] (HELO mx05.syd.iprimus.net.au) (210.50.30.235) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 May 2008 04:24:06 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvIAADfkNUg6siZ6/2dsb2JhbAAIr30 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,527,1204462800"; d="scan'208";a="118928763" Received: from 122.110.dsl.syd.iprimus.net.au (HELO [192.168.237.213]) ([58.178.38.122]) by smtp05.syd.iprimus.net.au with ESMTP; 23 May 2008 14:23:50 +1000 Message-Id: From: Brett Porter To: repository@apache.org In-Reply-To: <510143ac0805220413g3adbccddm6dca52f5eb9ca856@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Subject: Re: Timestamped snapshot artifacts in m2-snapshot-repository Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 14:23:44 +1000 References: <510143ac0805220413g3adbccddm6dca52f5eb9ca856@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 22/05/2008, at 9:13 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > Is there some guidance on whether snapshot artifacts deployed to > m2-snapshot-repository should have unique version timestamps instead > of the -SNAPSHOT label? It's really up to you and your needs. I prefer timestamped ones overall, as long as they are properly maintained. > > > If unique versions are better, how should a project avoid excessive > disk usage over time? At present, each should be mindful of this themselves (eg, delete snapshots once a version is released). This is particularly a concern if you are deploying from CI and so generating large numbers. Cheers, - Brett -- Brett Porter brett@apache.org http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/