www-repository mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dennis Lundberg <denn...@apache.org>
Subject Re: wtf happened to log4j?
Date Wed, 28 Nov 2007 19:26:30 GMT
Curt Arnold wrote:
> We were quickly notified that updating log4j 1.2.15 had the unfortunate 
> side effect of propagating non-redistributable artifacts to dependent 
> projects.   Those artifacts are necessary to build log4j, but not 
> necessary to run log4j unless you use specific features.  We've marked 
> those dependencies as optional in our SVN HEAD's pom.xml 
> (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4j/trunk/pom.xml) and expect 
> to push out a 1.2.16 in the near future.
> 
> There was a suggestion to scope the dependencies as "provided" since if 
> those features were used, it would generally (but not exclusively) be in 
> a J2EE environment where the dependencies would be part of the J2EE 
> classpath.  However, that seems wrong based on my reading.
> 
> If you have any advice on the log4j 1.2.16 pom.xml, please post to 
> log4j-dev.  Thanks.

I have added a first patch to the issue [1] in Bugzilla. It only formats 
the pom properly.

There is another patch waiting on my disk, that adds versions for all 
plugins and fixes a few other minor things.

[1] http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43304

-- 
Dennis Lundberg

Mime
View raw message