www-repository mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Guillaume Nodet" <gno...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: POM licensing
Date Tue, 02 Oct 2007 08:27:38 GMT
The solution is to put the copyright below the root element.
See http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/pom.xml
In such cases, the header is kept untouched.

On 10/1/07, Carsten Ziegeler <cziegeler@apache.org> wrote:
> Wendy Smoak wrote:
> > On 9/30/07, Robert Burrell Donkin <rdonkin@apache.org> wrote:
> >> many (most?) pom's in the repository lack license information. it's
> >> therefore unclear under what conditions the meta-data can be used or
> >> re-used. this prevents meta-data mining.
> >>
> >> since the respository is hosted on apache hardware, IMHO the meta-data
> >> released through the repository should be explicitly licensed under
> >> ALv2.0.
> >
> > It should be there (assuming it's present in svn).  There was a bug in
> > the release plugin that stripped comments:
> > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-180
> >
> The bug is still in the current version of the release plugin - the fix
> from MRELEASE-180 only fixes some use cases, but not all. See
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-255
>
> Carsten
>
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> cziegeler@apache.org
>


-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/

Mime
View raw message