www-repository mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <Craig.Russ...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: POM licensing
Date Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:18:10 GMT
IMHO this is a real problem.

If there is a difference between the published pom from the project's  
distribution and the mirrored poms, then the mirrored poms should be  
fixed. Stripping the IP notice from a release is a bug plain and  
simple, and wherever this has been done it should be fixed.

Craig

On Sep 30, 2007, at 11:00 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:

> On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 09:44 -0700, Wendy Smoak wrote:
>> On 9/30/07, Robert Burrell Donkin <rdonkin@apache.org> wrote:
>>> many (most?) pom's in the repository lack license information. it's
>>> therefore unclear under what conditions the meta-data can be used or
>>> re-used. this prevents meta-data mining.
>>>
>>> since the respository is hosted on apache hardware, IMHO the meta- 
>>> data
>>> released through the repository should be explicitly licensed under
>>> ALv2.0.
>>
>> It should be there (assuming it's present in svn).  There was a  
>> bug in
>> the release plugin that stripped comments:
>> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-180
>
> probably explains why so many are missing
>
> - robert

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!


Mime
View raw message