www-repository mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Steve Loughran" <steve.lough...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: jsr 173 artifacts
Date Tue, 03 Jul 2007 12:32:38 GMT
On 03/07/07, Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@gmail.com> wrote:
> BEA donated the API and RI  to codehaus stax project under the Apache License.
> That's why you have two RIs and two APIs.  Though I agree this could
> be cleaned a bit ...
> The ones from stax are AL 2.0 whereas the original API and RI are not
> AL compatible.

Ok. And stax api 1.0.1 is compatible with impl 1.2.0, I hope.

There's also a stax implementation in java.xml.stream in Java1.6,
isn't there? What version is that in sync with? 1.0.1. or 1.0.0?

-steve

>
> On 7/3/07, Steve Loughran <steve.loughran@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm trying to understand how best to import Stax parsers
> >
> > we have three apparent API Jars
> >
> > http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/javax.xml/jsr173/1.0
> > http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/javax.xml.bind/jsr173_api/1.0
> > http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/stax/stax-api
> >
> > and two competeting reference implementations
> > http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.bea.xml/jsr173-ri
> > http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/stax/stax
> >
> > What is going on here?
> >
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Principal Engineer, IONA
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>

Mime
View raw message