Mailing-List: contact repository-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: repository@apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of carlossg@gmail.com designates
 66.249.92.175 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=bPd+v/6HFM75FBCqlhRnnYjYuUlvC+AmNacmyF1i0yXs0Enyn/YFX23kH/i8pkveRw72MFcsydWRmR93XAVK3DkMgDekoC+q2qZG1pycg+WmfQBywFd4NbTXneRccH9d23R/d9N4i2QnkAaTdiM8OBNuhMov5HLYj+UqJmarJg4=
Message-ID: <1a5b6c410612121254x21d4bafcw69f3beebf7878e18@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:54:56 +0100
From: "Carlos Sanchez" <carlos@apache.org>
Sender: carlossg@gmail.com
To: repository@apache.org, dims@apache.org
Subject: Re: [repo] /www/people.apache.org/repo/m1-ibiblio-rsync-repository/
Cc: "Wendy Smoak" <wsmoak@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <19e0530f0612121235s2302789cl264cbc5dbafaf657@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20061211091504.18111.qmail@minotaur.apache.org>
	 <9d4ec10b0612112017o300a0cctfadc2bb0acf817be@mail.gmail.com>
	 <adba96190612112046j55e58072ue4f9df872f23a174@mail.gmail.com>
	 <9d4ec10b0612112130m67719b0arfb73cb1968cdb176@mail.gmail.com>
	 <adba96190612112148n246b0246tb8050279de2ac933@mail.gmail.com>
	 <9d4ec10b0612112204l3bc9fa3fh138ea2bcc1c9e2b4@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1a5b6c410612120232x22eff7a0te31c712d0e87f8fe@mail.gmail.com>
	 <19e0530f0612120601k3c8da1dbodfede2702491a8e4@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1a5b6c410612121211y16ddbcf8mbde0df0346041192@mail.gmail.com>
	 <19e0530f0612121235s2302789cl264cbc5dbafaf657@mail.gmail.com>

I'm not making any decision, that's why this thread started. I recall
that there was at some point some agreement that it was going to be
org.apache.PMCName, somebody can refresh my memory?

I'm sorry I don't really know who to ask about this as it affects all
projects in apache.

On 12/12/06, Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com> wrote:
> Carlos,
>
> If it is an apache wide decision, then people should be consulted,
> *you* can't make that decision.
>
> -- dims
>
> On 12/12/06, Carlos Sanchez <carlos@apache.org> wrote:
> > I think it is an apache wide decision how to make groupids look like,
> > not just ws PMC.
> >
> > What I'm gonna do next time there's doubts about anything in the repo
> > is move it out of the way until they are cleared.
> >
> > On 12/12/06, Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Carlos, Wendy,
> > >
> > > Am sorry. It's none of repository@'s business on how the group Id
> > > should look like!!! It's upto the project and it's pmc.
> > >
> > > Please leave things the way they are. If you wish to influence the
> > > decisions, please drop by general@ws and evangalize there.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > dims
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 12/12/06, Carlos Sanchez <carlos@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > I think we are still in the timeframe for moving it, anybody disagree?
> > > >
> > > > On 12/12/06, Chamikara Jayalath <chamikaramj@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > I understand your point.
> > > > >
> > > > > Unfortunately Sadesha2 release was also done on Sunday. And dists etc are
> > > > > already available in Apache dists and other mirrors.
> > > > >
> > > > > I would have certainly corrected the group id hd I know that such a
> > > > > discussion occured here before but I guess its too late now :-(
> > > > >
> > > > > Chamikara
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 12/12/06, Wendy Smoak <wsmoak@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On 12/11/06, Chamikara Jayalath <chamikaramj@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Actually I was following the convention that was being followed by many
> > > > > WS
> > > > > > > projects. I.e. to have the package name in the group Id.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > For example Apache Axis2 project has the group Id ' org.apache.axis2'
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > Apache Axis has the group Id 'org.apache.axis'. Is there an reason to do
> > > > > it
> > > > > > > differently in this project ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Maven convention is to use a domain name that you control, not
> > > > > > (necessarily) the package name.  (See:
> > > > > >
> > > > > http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-ibiblio-upload.html)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In addition, within Apache we like to be able to easily identify the
> > > > > > responsible PMC by looking at the groupId.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think we've talked about Axis and Axis2 here before.  IMO, they also
> > > > > > belong under org.apache.ws and should eventually be relocated.  When
> > > > > > there are existing releases, changing the groupId can cause some pain,
> > > > > > so they're generally being allowed to stay for now.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For new sub-projects within Apache, there's no reason to continue
> > > > > > inventing new groupIds that don't correspond to top level projects.
> > > > > > For this one, org.apache.ws.sandesha2 seems appropriate.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Carlos, any further thoughts on this?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Wendy
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > > >                              -- The Princess Bride
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers)
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> >                              -- The Princess Bride
> >
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers)
>


-- 
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
                             -- The Princess Bride