www-repository mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Davanum Srinivas" <dava...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [repo] /www/people.apache.org/repo/m1-ibiblio-rsync-repository/
Date Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:35:22 GMT
Carlos,

If it is an apache wide decision, then people should be consulted,
*you* can't make that decision.

-- dims

On 12/12/06, Carlos Sanchez <carlos@apache.org> wrote:
> I think it is an apache wide decision how to make groupids look like,
> not just ws PMC.
>
> What I'm gonna do next time there's doubts about anything in the repo
> is move it out of the way until they are cleared.
>
> On 12/12/06, Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Carlos, Wendy,
> >
> > Am sorry. It's none of repository@'s business on how the group Id
> > should look like!!! It's upto the project and it's pmc.
> >
> > Please leave things the way they are. If you wish to influence the
> > decisions, please drop by general@ws and evangalize there.
> >
> > thanks,
> > dims
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12/12/06, Carlos Sanchez <carlos@apache.org> wrote:
> > > I think we are still in the timeframe for moving it, anybody disagree?
> > >
> > > On 12/12/06, Chamikara Jayalath <chamikaramj@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I understand your point.
> > > >
> > > > Unfortunately Sadesha2 release was also done on Sunday. And dists etc
are
> > > > already available in Apache dists and other mirrors.
> > > >
> > > > I would have certainly corrected the group id hd I know that such a
> > > > discussion occured here before but I guess its too late now :-(
> > > >
> > > > Chamikara
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 12/12/06, Wendy Smoak <wsmoak@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On 12/11/06, Chamikara Jayalath <chamikaramj@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Actually I was following the convention that was being followed
by many
> > > > WS
> > > > > > projects. I.e. to have the package name in the group Id.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For example Apache Axis2 project has the group Id ' org.apache.axis2'
> > > > and
> > > > > > Apache Axis has the group Id 'org.apache.axis'. Is there an
reason to do
> > > > it
> > > > > > differently in this project ?
> > > > >
> > > > > The Maven convention is to use a domain name that you control, not
> > > > > (necessarily) the package name.  (See:
> > > > >
> > > > http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-ibiblio-upload.html)
> > > > >
> > > > > In addition, within Apache we like to be able to easily identify
the
> > > > > responsible PMC by looking at the groupId.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think we've talked about Axis and Axis2 here before.  IMO, they
also
> > > > > belong under org.apache.ws and should eventually be relocated.  When
> > > > > there are existing releases, changing the groupId can cause some
pain,
> > > > > so they're generally being allowed to stay for now.
> > > > >
> > > > > For new sub-projects within Apache, there's no reason to continue
> > > > > inventing new groupIds that don't correspond to top level projects.
> > > > > For this one, org.apache.ws.sandesha2 seems appropriate.
> > > > >
> > > > > Carlos, any further thoughts on this?
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Wendy
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > >                              -- The Princess Bride
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers)
> >
>
>
> --
> I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
>                              -- The Princess Bride
>


-- 
Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers)

Mime
View raw message