www-repository mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Guillaume Nodet" <gno...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: JSR173
Date Wed, 02 Aug 2006 20:16:18 GMT
On 8/2/06, Carlos Sanchez <carlos@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On 8/2/06, Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 8/2/06, Carlos Sanchez <carlos@apache.org> wrote:
> > > it's pretty close to geronimo case.
> >
> >
> > there's no reason why it should be different ;)
>
> geronimo jars are not the reference implementation and can't go under
> javax.*


I missed what you meant.
The different is that the reference API has been relicensed and donated to
the stax project.
The 1.0 jar is just the RI relicensed, so the case is quite different from
the Geronimo one.

>
> > > If it's actually the BEA's
> > > reference they should put it prominently on the site.
> >
> >
> > I will reping their mailing list so that they change their
> > website to be more explicit.
> >
> > > On 8/2/06, Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > They are already on public repositories:
> > > >     http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/stax/stax-api/1.0.1/
> > > > I guess, the pom should be the same than the one for
> > > >      javax.xml.jsr173
> > > > and the license is available at
> > > >
> > > >
> > http://svn.stax.codehaus.org/browse/stax/trunk/dev/ASF2.0.txt
> > > > though i have already asked on the list to advertise that a bit more
> > > > on their site (stax.codehaus.org ).
> > > >
> > > > I can raise a JIRA with an upload bundle if needed, just want to
> > > > make sure I need to.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 8/2/06, Carlos Sanchez <carlos@apache.org > wrote:
> > > > > Can you provide links to jar, pom and where the license can be
> found?
> > > > >
> > > > > On 8/1/06, Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Based on some old discussions on legal,
> > > > > > it appears that jsr173 jar from bea has been relicensed under
> ASL 2
> > > > > > and donated to the codehaus stax project.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Would it be possible to something so that the default location
> > points
> > > > > > to a valid jar (in javax/xml/jsr173).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Not sure what the best way would be, but ...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > Guillaume Nodet
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > > > >                              -- The Princess Bride
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Guillaume Nodet
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > >                              -- The Princess Bride
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Guillaume Nodet
>
>
> --
> I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
>                              -- The Princess Bride
>



-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet

Mime
View raw message