www-repository mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Carlos Sanchez" <car...@apache.org>
Subject Re: which ejb. persistence
Date Wed, 23 Aug 2006 22:43:53 GMT
On 8/23/06, Steve Loughran <steve.loughran@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 23/08/06, Carlos Sanchez <carlos@apache.org> wrote:
> > On 8/23/06, Steve Loughran <steve.loughran@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 23/08/06, Carlos Sanchez <carlos@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > First remeber that nothing can be removed from the repo.
> > >
> > > I understand that releases of stuff can't be removed.
> > >
> > > But what about
> > > a) random bits of junk like the
> > > javax/persistence/ejb-3.0-public-draft/ artifact?
> > >
> > > > Then, javax.persisntence ejb were poms of prereleases pointing to
> > > > where the api could be found, as it couldn't be redistributed.
> > >
> > > those are poms that now point to stuff that cant be retrieved as
> > > they've effectively been retired. They may be refererred to by things
> > > like hibernate-annotations, but that just means that the version of
> > > hibernate-annotations cannot be resolved without human intervention.
> > >
> >
> > when it was added it worked. If other people remove their releases
> > there's nothing I can do
> >
>
> This is a losing battle. If you can't lock down other people's stuff
> (and you cant), and you wont ever purge the repository of invalid
> external links, then gradually, over time, the quality of the
> repository is going to decline.
>
>
> >
> > >
> > > > javax.persistence persistence-api 1.0 is the reference implementation
> > > > from glassfish and synced from
> > > > https://maven-repository.dev.java.net/nonav/repository/
> > >
> > > hmmm. I see they dont publish the javax.ejb stuff there, do they?
> > >
> >
> > afaik that is not under CDDL and can't be redistributed
> >
>
> On this topic, if I were to create my own, personal javaee entry in a
> private repo, where should it go?
>
> 1) javax/javaee/javaee/5.0
> 2) javax/ejb/javaee/5.0
> 3) javax/j2ee/j2ee/1,5?
>
> technically, (3) is more accurate, as there already is a 1.4 pom...
> -steve
>

3 is ok, if you make the pom it can be uploaded to the repo


-- 
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
                             -- The Princess Bride

Mime
View raw message