Mailing-List: contact repository-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: repository@apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of flamefew@gmail.com designates
 66.249.92.170 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=EiEIrfapSRbiL38togJh/eH2gjqIoemlW4KsDnrpM+XAROm7xMxw7Cc74f8PWiy2vhrRMASL7Zd1l3tan6KtsHr5NIRF1Ajq5YDEt39rIpEarfEkWly52axKBsX6v9B16zrJ6IV1oF0FG0ne+YbBdVdVkNJGN9LoZcGYOjbSGl4=
Message-ID: <31cc37360607192152o3e44a572gdbc2851358cd26a9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 21:52:54 -0700
From: "Henri Yandell" <flamefew@gmail.com>
To: repository@apache.org
Subject: Re: Further repo rules?
In-Reply-To: <1a5b6c410607191542q42135ce9v78d51e206e0c4b77@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <31cc37360607191439r5840f4ffx7858757487fa1ab5@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1a5b6c410607191542q42135ce9v78d51e206e0c4b77@mail.gmail.com>

Talked with infra guys about that - it's a worry because it would have
to run as root and people could just do things like making a symlink
to /etc/passwd.

So I'm going the notification route.

Hen

On 7/19/06, Carlos Sanchez <carlos@apache.org> wrote:
> I would really prefer setting the permissions automatically if
> possible instead of chasing people and get it fixed.
>
> On 7/19/06, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm working on some more monitor scripting. Here's what I thought I
> > should be looking for:
> >
> >
> > 1) Anything in an ibiblio-rsync repository with SNAPSHOT in it.
> > 2) Anything in an m1 repository called maven-metadata.xml*.
> > 3) Any directory that is not 775
> > 4) Any maven-metadata.xml file that is not 775
> > 5) Any file that is not 755
> > 6) Any file/dir that does not have a group of apcvs
> >
> >
> > Report is:
> >
> > These files should not exist - please delete
> > ============================================
> > 1)       9
> > 2)  123
> >
> > These have incorrect permissions - should be 775
> > ================================================
> > 3)   952
> > 4) 6884
> >
> > These have incorrect permissions - should be 755
> > ================================================
> > 5)  65810
> >
> > These files should be owned by apcvs
> > ====================================
> > 6)   9947
> >
> >
> > The first two seem like obvious ones to check on - how about the rest?
> > Should we allow 775 or 664, and any group as an owner?
> >
> > Hen
> >
>
>
> --
> I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
>                              -- The Princess Bride
>