Mailing-List: contact repository-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: repository@apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of flamefew@gmail.com designates
 64.233.166.179 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=TekCE1+Zd9UP2rSfNae1EaKbjyejqtR4hFdjsAJBmC+ZBhelW72TKVAQZVF2P7cbs1qeqCKrYF/CF6q44tXRY30HEjRK3EUXhQx4oASATBcXzqauYZBdZiUsNRurkwy580y9wCtSYEhwsBp08/MxBjAxvc60F1Pt6X4iHLxvjto=
Message-ID: <31cc37360604210942u6b684110o11d96bacdd1098d7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 09:42:41 -0700
From: "Henri Yandell" <flamefew@gmail.com>
To: repository@apache.org
Subject: Re: Repo complaints
In-Reply-To: <1a5b6c410604142330g7fd2b3c1k728199fd9b10e0d9@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <31cc37360604141038le77a7edo72e8fb0fbd745cfe@mail.gmail.com>
	 <adba96190604141121h52364404m7a17997a15ede7fc@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1a5b6c410604141209r61d76bccsc9bcfd4a78225d4f@mail.gmail.com>
	 <31cc37360604141928k68056ba1k97ddb95b72984908@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1a5b6c410604142330g7fd2b3c1k728199fd9b10e0d9@mail.gmail.com>

On 4/14/06, Carlos Sanchez <carlos@apache.org> wrote:
> On 4/14/06, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Any reason not to just rm the distribution folders?
>
> nope

I'll look into doing so.

> > On the commons-lang source/javadoc - how do the projects replace the
> > ones currently deployed? Can we deploy to the m1 repository on apache
> > and it'll replace, or will the ones that are there by hand take
> > precedence?
>
> new ones will replace old ones (I think). We'll need to check after.
>
> >
> > How do you build them out of interest? Source distribution, svn tag? I
> > noticed that they don't have a manifest (I presume you used zip rather
> > than jar?), is there a need for a manifest?
>
> they only use case for them I know is IDE integration, so as long as
> it's a valid jar it's ok. You can do either from tag or source distro

Reason for asking in this case is that until very recently the tag for
Lang 2.1 was broken - it had source that shouldn't be in it. I'm
guessing you used the distro or did it after the tag was fixed as
you've not got the text package in there.

Hen