Mailing-List: contact repository-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: repository@apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of carlossg@gmail.com designates
 64.233.184.205 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=pze6jX/rHClWlQfG1D29Q7+WgSWbVC7GJNHMB/h1/Nbuw+IZ1J6TFfWkmbm/UYWGVDcn+na6Cw4ddyd8cZ9zC44px24xDC9UaBodPRFk9oe0TD/ZBc8+4RuPo03BFRF5LTnQEAN+omZLL2L9r6TYnFgWao6SJ5Can8OaufxmF3M=
Message-ID: <1a5b6c410603060936x797aacdcibb00adbdb864b422@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 09:36:26 -0800
From: "Carlos Sanchez" <carlos@apache.org>
Sender: carlossg@gmail.com
To: repository@apache.org
Subject: Re: cleaned up?
In-Reply-To: <31cc37360603060026w43cc4170jd14d13d71a2d1ef3@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <31cc37360603060026w43cc4170jd14d13d71a2d1ef3@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/6/06, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is it me, or have things been cleaned up in java-repository and
> maven-repository?
>
> Additional things that look bad in java-repository:
>
> ant-doxygen (looks to be a sourceforge project)
> nekohtml (pseudo apache, lives in ~andyc)
>
> [with a Jakarta hat on: ]
> commons-grafolia (never heard of this)
> commons-http (unreleased)
> commons-graph (moved to codehaus)
> commons-latka (empty dir)
> commons-messenger (moved to codehaus)
> commons-threadpool (unreleased)
> commons-resource (unreleased)
> commons-xo (unreleased)
> commons-jux (unreleased)
> velocity-dvsl (unreleased)

I'd remove or move them to the snapshot repo

>
> [full of geronimo jars, but I don't think this fits the m1 spec]
> org/ directory


They need to be warned. They are also using a SNAPSHOT parent pom, so
it shouldn't be on maven-repository.


>
> directory-clients//poms contains SNAPSHOTS

I'd remove or move them to the snapshot repo

>
> Also, how about killing directories that don't actually have jars in?

It's fine

>
> Lastly, do we have a policy on RC's? Should they be sitting in the
> release repository, or should they be treated as snapshots and not go
> to ibiblio?

I think they should be widely available to be tested, that's the purpose of=
 RCs.

>
> Hen
>


--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
                             -- The Princess Bride