Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-repository-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 90542 invoked from network); 4 May 2005 17:31:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 May 2005 17:31:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 51965 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2005 17:28:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-repository-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 51937 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2005 17:28:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact repository-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: repository@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list repository@apache.org Received: (qmail 51903 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2005 17:28:53 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of steve.loughran@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.207 as permitted sender) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.207) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2005 10:28:53 -0700 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 70so414377wra for ; Wed, 04 May 2005 10:26:41 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=JBsAQJWdV6Qnw8gVPMBCV0h91Kbr463/BO+c84nK3r8bGnXmSQgYiExHD5crEDaV//OorfMi4q6r6gwpuHOVj7SWiMZr6iVlPFDZndg/hjeCoTZyMevXYpMy8zjUOcnvI9uUubATMaZRENFaAJU8iHG2oQBX/9HTwiDI1wD4xtw= Received: by 10.54.102.8 with SMTP id z8mr288897wrb; Wed, 04 May 2005 10:26:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.92.19 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2005 10:26:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 18:26:41 +0100 From: Steve Loughran Reply-To: Steve Loughran To: repository@apache.org Subject: Re: Proposal for a centralized Eclipse update manager site for Apache projects/software In-Reply-To: <200505041958.53285.niclas@apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200505041947.44086.niclas@apache.org> <200505041958.53285.niclas@apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 5/4/05, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Wednesday 04 May 2005 19:54, Milos Kleint wrote: > > > Milos, didn't Netbeans itself devise some funky system for the > > > non-distributables and click-thru license approvals?? > > > > AFAIK such dependencies are scrambled and during the build process a > > special ant task shows a dialog with license and unscrables them. Not > > sure it's something like that could be generalized. >=20 > But why is it legally possible for Netbeans (not accounting for Sun being= Sun) > to do such manouver ? >=20 Presumably the files in question are hosted on Sun sites, so there is no redistribution until the actual download in the ant task. That is not a facility we have. NB, one defect in the netbeans process is that it requests permissions again even on a point update of an existing binary. Really it should only ask if the license has changed. -steve