Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-repository-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 31518 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2004 20:11:52 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Mar 2004 20:11:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 1079 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2004 20:11:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-repository-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 1032 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2004 20:11:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact repository-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: repository@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list repository@apache.org Received: (qmail 1009 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2004 20:11:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com) (24.25.9.101) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Mar 2004 20:11:41 -0000 Received: from noel770 (cae88-20-092.sc.rr.com [24.88.20.92]) by ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id i2KKBfkH000953 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 15:11:44 -0500 (EST) From: "Noel J. Bergman" To: Subject: RE: Avalon currently is not a paradise! Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 15:11:35 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <405CA2EA.30402@latte.harvard.edu> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > While that is a possible solution, it creates alot of maintence issues > and isn't very scalable. I think there could be a cleaner solution if > both parties got involved with making adjustments. Understood. Just trying to propose something that can be done immediately, while the adjustments are discussed. --- Noel