Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-repository-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 21032 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2004 22:13:58 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2004 22:13:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 39872 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2004 22:13:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-repository-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 39845 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2004 22:13:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact repository-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: repository@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list repository@apache.org Received: (qmail 39832 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2004 22:13:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp-out6.blueyonder.co.uk) (195.188.213.9) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2004 22:13:45 -0000 Received: from [10.0.0.2] ([82.38.65.173]) by smtp-out6.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Thu, 11 Mar 2004 22:04:35 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v612) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <13FA6EB3-73A8-11D8-8FCE-003065DC754C@apache.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: robert burrell donkin Subject: Re: adding jaxme jars Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 22:04:33 +0000 To: repository@apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.612) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Mar 2004 22:04:35.0093 (UTC) FILETIME=[D6B54C50:01C407B4] X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N hi noel sander's post early on this thread (quite reasonably) suggested that it'd be a good idea for the repository team to think about how to handle incubating projects in general (before any more come along). i think that sounds like a very reasonable plan. it also seems to me (at least) that it's really the incubator pmc who are the right people to ask about the management of releases created whilst under incubation (including any special measures that might be required for jars released whilst in incubation). - robert On 11 Mar 2004, at 21:15, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > I would expect JaxMe to be released by the WS PMC. You should raise > any > issue with them. > > --- Noel > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark R. Diggory [mailto:mdiggory@latte.harvard.edu] > Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 16:00 > To: repository@apache.org > Subject: Re: adding jaxme jars > > > Is there just an issue with where its going to be located then? (I.E. > site, cvs/svn location and distribution directories)? I'm very > unfamiliar with the Incubator and its policies so excuse my naivety. > Once a project has graduated via Vote, is there a process for its > "migration"? I think this was possibly Roberts point. > > -Mark >