Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-repository-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 93212 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2003 15:45:37 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Dec 2003 15:45:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 84314 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2003 15:45:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-repository-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 84232 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2003 15:45:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact repository-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: repository@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list repository@apache.org Received: (qmail 84218 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2003 15:45:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.try.sybase.com) (130.214.10.19) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Dec 2003 15:45:31 -0000 Received: from mail.try.sybase.com (mail.try.sybase.com [130.214.10.18]) by mx1.try.sybase.com (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id hBCEeW215923 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 07:40:32 -0700 Received: from tsws1 ([158.159.8.85]) by mail.try.sybase.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id hBCFVQk20424 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 08:31:27 -0700 Message-ID: <319801c3c0c7$0e93fbb0$d3931f43@tsws1> From: "Adam R. B. Jack" To: References: Subject: Re: Anywhere near concensus? Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 08:45:29 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > > Done: http://cvs.apache.org/~ajack/repository/proposals/ > > I think of the group, I like repositoryFQDN/ best. For me, it is between that and group (oh yeah, I asked for that one. ;-) 'cos they are both of deterministic directory depth/layout. [BTW: If things get 'overloaded' we can do the traditional /fred -> /f/r/fred w/o changing deterministic depth/layout.] That said, to me 'group' and FQDN don't need to be any different --- one is just saying 'for Java projects (or those w/ DN-like packages) the likely group name is the FQDN of the root package'. regards, Adam