www-repository mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Adam R. B. Jack" <aj...@trysybase.com>
Subject Re: Anywhere near concensus?
Date Fri, 12 Dec 2003 15:45:29 GMT


> > Done:    http://cvs.apache.org/~ajack/repository/proposals/
>
> I think of the group, I like repositoryFQDN/ best.

For me, it is between that and group (oh yeah, I asked for that one. ;-)
'cos they are both of deterministic directory depth/layout.

[BTW: If things get 'overloaded' we can do the traditional /fred ->
/f/r/fred w/o changing deterministic depth/layout.]

That said, to me 'group' and FQDN don't need to be any different --- one is
just saying 'for Java projects (or those w/ DN-like packages) the likely
group name is the FQDN of the root package'.

regards,

Adam


Mime
View raw message