Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-repository-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 54280 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2003 00:29:42 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Nov 2003 00:29:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 41955 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2003 00:29:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-repository-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 41901 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2003 00:29:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact repository-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: repository@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list repository@apache.org Received: (qmail 41888 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2003 00:29:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO adslgateway.multitask.com.au) (202.44.167.185) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Nov 2003 00:29:26 -0000 In-Reply-To: <3FAED491.3030203@apache.org> To: repository@apache.org Subject: Re: Comments on URI Syntax MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5 September 26, 2003 From: dion@multitask.com.au Message-ID: Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:34:41 +1100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ADSLGateway/Multitask Consulting/AU(Release 6.0|September 26, 2002) at 10/11/2003 11:35:04 AM, Serialize complete at 10/11/2003 11:35:04 AM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Stephen McConnell wrote on 10/11/2003 10:58:09 AM: > By implication - the README is not an artifact but a feature of a version. > Is that a reasonable conclusion? I'd question the value of distributing a README as a single file. In the maven world, we have a type called 'distribution', which contains a README, jar, source etc. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ Pub Key:http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/public-key.asc