Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-repository-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 21249 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2003 12:16:37 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Nov 2003 12:16:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 46699 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2003 12:16:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-repository-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 46663 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2003 12:16:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact repository-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: repository@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list repository@apache.org Received: (qmail 46650 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2003 12:16:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO eri.interia.pl) (217.74.65.138) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Nov 2003 12:16:35 -0000 Received: from poczta.interia.pl (egaheer.interia.pl [217.74.65.182]) by eri.interia.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5688426177 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:16:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by system.wewnetrzny9 (poczta.interia.pl) with SMTP id 3CB153742B4 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:16:35 +0100 (CET) Received: by poczta.interia.pl (poczta.interia.pl, from userid 502) id 207373742DF; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:16:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from interia.pl (unknown [193.247.212.12]) by poczta.interia.pl (poczta.interia.pl) with ESMTP id 0DBD23742B4 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:16:34 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <3FAF818A.5000808@interia.pl> Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:16:10 +0100 From: Michal Maczka User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6a) Gecko/20031030 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: repository@apache.org Subject: Re: [proposal] java artifact specifier v0.1 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Tim Anderson wrote: >>From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:mcconnell@apache.org] >> >>Michal Maczka wrote: >> >> >> >>>IMHO "type" directory should be mandatory >>> >>> >>+1 >> >> > >-1 for reasons outlined previously in >http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?listName=repository@apache.org&ms >gNo=312 > > You mean your example with index.html? I am repating that for me this file is not an artifacts. We can imagine that we will have repositories accssible via ftp:// file:// scp:// , cvs:// In such repositiries "index.html" is rather useless My intutitive definition of artifacts is: a) Artifact is a file which you would like to see in any of those type of repositories mentioned above b) Artifact is a file which is in some sense intresting for computers/tools (and possibly for humans) index.html is not such file. So I am still +1 for directories per type regards Michal