www-repository mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From d...@multitask.com.au
Subject RE: [proposal] java artifact specifier v0.1
Date Tue, 11 Nov 2003 00:32:21 GMT
"Noel J. Bergman" <noel@devtech.com> wrote on 11/11/2003 07:33:53 AM:

> > Why "source" and not "sources"?
> > Plural form of  "type" should be used consistently for naming 
> That's a bit nit-picky.  Let's agree on the structure, and then worry 
> spelling.  :-)
> > I am still against versionless filenames:
> Why?  KEYS, for example, need not have a version.  Probably SHOULD not 
> a version, in fact.  The latest version should be used.  In most other

Keys may indeed have a version. KEYS may not always be cumulative. And if 
it had a version number, wouldn't need to be.

dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog:      http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Pub Key:http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/public-key.asc

View raw message