www-repository mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From d...@multitask.com.au
Subject Re: licensing issues for virtual artifacts (was RE: click through license support?)
Date Tue, 25 Nov 2003 13:52:02 GMT
Nicola Ken Barozzi <nicolaken@apache.org> wrote on 25/11/2003 07:23:15 PM:

> 
> dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> 
> > Why don't we just focus on:
> > 
> > a) getting an ASF-only repository up first, and
> > b) Getting the management and tooling for that
> > 
> > before taking on virtual hosting.
> > 
> > I'm failing to see the requirement for us to do that *now*.
> 
> Because Apache projects using the repository would need also non-asf 
> jars that we don't want to distribute -> virtual artifacts.

And there are other places those jars can be found.

I'm failing to see how this impacts a repo that stores ASF-only content.

I agree it would be a nice to have, but is it a requirement for an ASF 
repo?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog:      http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/





Mime
View raw message