Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-repository-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 73234 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2003 21:00:37 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Oct 2003 21:00:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 11685 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2003 21:00:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-repository-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 11662 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2003 21:00:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact repository-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: repository@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list repository@apache.org Received: (qmail 11648 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2003 21:00:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO adslgateway.multitask.com.au) (202.44.167.185) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Oct 2003 21:00:26 -0000 In-Reply-To: <3FA15BDA.5070705@chalko.com> To: repository@apache.org Subject: Re: URI Syntax was: Repository MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5 September 26, 2003 From: dion@multitask.com.au Message-ID: Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 08:06:14 +1100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ADSLGateway/Multitask Consulting/AU(Release 6.0|September 26, 2002) at 31/10/2003 08:06:16 AM, Serialize complete at 31/10/2003 08:06:16 AM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Nick Chalko wrote on 31/10/2003 05:43:38 AM: > dion@multitask.com.au wrote: > > > > >Simple focussed discussion without talking about incubating projects or > >adopting projects works for me. Those are separate issues. > > So here is a key focuossed issue. > What should the URI look like > > The latest URI discussed was > > http://///artifact-[].ext > > For example > * http://repo.apache.org/org-apache-ant/1.5.1/ant-1.5.1.jar http://repo.apache.org/org-apache-ant/1.5.1/ant-1.5.1.jar, e.g. www.apache.org/dist/ant/1.5.1/ant-1.5.1.jar > * http://repo.apache.org/org-apache-ant/1.5.1/ant-testutil-1.5.1.jar > * http://repo.apache.org/org-apache-ant/1.5.1/LICENSE.txt > > > > = Special versions. = > Most people agree we should support Latest (released), and Nightly, > along with the normal released builds Maven also has 'SNAPSHOT' which is similar in context to Nightly, but not necessarily built on a nightly basis. > The part still needs to be decided is the project name. Since this is an ASF repo, isn't the ASF project name enough? > I think the most stable idea proposed is the java package name with - > instead of . I'd prefer to stick with the ASF project name. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ Pub Key:http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/public-key.asc