www-repository mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From d...@multitask.com.au
Subject Re: Revival
Date Fri, 24 Oct 2003 03:59:11 GMT
There's also the code in maven-new/fetch.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog:      http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Pub Key:http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/public-key.asc


Nicola Ken Barozzi <nicolaken@apache.org> wrote on 23/10/2003 11:24:59 PM:

> 
> Leo Simons wrote:
> 
> > As for standards, I like the concensus we arrived at
> > (and I would be highly against changing that again now
> > as its just a major pain in the **** to move 100s of
> > files around).
> 
>  From my site, I totally agree.
> 
> > As for code, well, personally, not really.
> > Maven worksforme :D. But it could be a good idea
> > nevertheless.
> 
> We must cater for all projects, not only Maven-enabled ones.
> Yes, it's possible to take away the code from Maven and make that 
> indipendent, but again I propose to start from Version and Ruper, as 
> IMHO they are more complete as a repository solution.
> 
> The bottom line is that I just want a versioning and repository system, 
> adn I don't like having to replicate things here and in krysalis. Hence 
> the proposal to move the code here and make all be able to access it and 

> work on it.
> 
> In case some want to know, I have personally never touched the Ruper2 
> code nor the Version code, and will not actively partecipate in its 
> development. But there is a small community at krysalis that is working 
> like mad on these things, and I think that it might be beneficial to 
> Apache if it happens here instead.
> 
> -- 
> Nicola Ken Barozzi                   nicolaken@apache.org
>              - verba volant, scripta manent -
>     (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> 


Mime
View raw message