Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact repository-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list repository@apache.org Received: (qmail 10833 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2003 23:12:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO costin.sfo.covalent.net) (64.84.39.162) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Apr 2003 23:12:03 -0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by costin.sfo.covalent.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF1970F25 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 18:09:08 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 15:08:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Costin Manolache X-X-Sender: costin@costin.sfo.covalent.net To: ASF Repository Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [VOTE] distribute the compiled .jar binaries as part of the /dist] In-Reply-To: <3E9353E7.30402@chalko.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII; FORMAT=flowed Content-ID: X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tue, 8 Apr 2003, Nick Chalko wrote: > I almost missed this thread. > > The jar repository issue continues. Except it's no longer the "jar repository issue" :-) Just "use the /dist layout the way it is supposed to" - i.e to distribute our releases. Jars are just one type of binary - and I think it should follow the same rules as .exe and .so and .tgz files ( from the point of view of the /dist layout ). If one or another repository is defined and distributes some jars in whatever layout - that's wonderfull, but so far all I'm concerned is that releases go to /dist, including binaries ( like .jars ). Costin