Return-Path: <dion@multitask.com.au>
Mailing-List: contact repository-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list repository@apache.org
Received: (qmail 18387 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2003 05:14:29 -0000
Received: from 202-44-167-185.nexnet.net.au (HELO
 adslgateway.multitask.com.au) (202.44.167.185)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Mar 2003 05:14:29 -0000
In-Reply-To: <3E66CFAB.3020405@chalko.com>
To: repository@apache.org
Subject: Re: URI syntax
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.0.1 February 07, 2003
From: dion@multitask.com.au
Message-ID: 
 <OF2D8B1D1A.9D3D658B-ONCA256CE1.001CB4BE-CA256CE1.001CD81A@multitask.com.au>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 16:14:53 +1100
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ADSLGateway/Multitask
 Consulting/AU(Release 6.0|September
 26, 2002) at 06/03/2003 04:14:54 PM,
	Serialize complete at 06/03/2003 04:14:54 PM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Why not use the package name with '/' instead of '.', e.g.

org/
  apache/
    ant/
      1.5.1/
    avalon/
    commons/
      httpclient/
         2.0/

etc?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog:      http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
Work:      http://www.multitask.com.au


Nick Chalko <nick@chalko.com> wrote on 06/03/2003 03:33:47 PM:

> http://<host>/<project>/<version>/artifact-[<version>].ext 
> Seems to be a reasonable compromise.
> 
> For example
> 
> http://repo.apache.org/org-apache-ant/1.5.1/ant-1.5.1.jar
> http://repo.apache.org/org-apache-ant/1.5.1/ant-testutil-1.5.1.jar
> http://repo.apache.org/org-apache-ant/1.5.1/LICENSE.txt
> 
> 
> 
> The part  still needs to be decided is the project name.
> 
> I thing the most stable idea proposed is the java package name with - 
> instead of .
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>