Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact repository-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list repository@apache.org Received: (qmail 41684 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2003 01:47:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO set.superlinksoftware.com) (66.35.175.110) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2003 01:47:58 -0000 Received: from rdu57-249-152.nc.rr.com ([66.57.249.152]) by set.superlinksoftware.com (JAMES SMTP Server 2.1) with SMTP ID 264 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2003 20:46:50 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E6BEED6.1050508@apache.org> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2003 20:48:06 -0500 From: "Andrew C. Oliver" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: repository@apache.org Subject: Re: [proposal] repository URI format References: <3E6A0008.5050307@apache.org> <3E6A1092.7070205@apache.org> <3E6B7FF6.1080209@apache.org> <3E6BE4DE.1000905@chalko.com> In-Reply-To: <3E6BE4DE.1000905@chalko.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > > I think this is an esential usecase > > That is why I support the URI first then XML path. Your itch, not mine. -Andy > > > > >