Mailing-List: contact mirrors-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: mirrors@apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of penning@uu.nl designates
 131.211.14.244 as permitted sender)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:18:10 +0100
From: "Henk P. Penning" <penning@uu.nl>
To: <mirrors@apache.org>
Subject: Re: openoffice at apache.org
In-Reply-To: <4F67D044.5080202@reverse.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1203200952380.30195@adonis.cs.uu.nl>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1203192131580.15965@adonis.cs.uu.nl>
 <4F67D044.5080202@reverse.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LRH 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format=flowed

On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, Matthew McGehrin -Reverse.Net- wrote:

> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 01:33:08 +0100
> From: Matthew McGehrin -Reverse.Net- <support@reverse.net>
> To: mirrors@apache.org
> Subject: Re: openoffice at apache.org

Hi All,

> I'm really not interested in hosting OpenOffice. Would mirrors be
> able to exclude this? Or would we have to stop being a mirror?

   This is what we want to find out ; if very many mirrors have
   a problem, we can look at making openoffice optional for
   mirrors.

   But, for now (for this poll), let us know if you have a
   problem with having "Apache OpenOffice" on your mirror.

   I will assume that sites that indicate "I have a problem"
   would like an "opt-out" ; and that sites that indicate
   "I would like an opt-out" will have a problem (and leave)
   if/when there isn't going to be an "opt-out".

   Remember: nothing is decided yet ; the goal of this poll
   is to find out what the best policy is.

   Regards,

   Henk Penning

---------------------------------------------------------   _
Henk P. Penning, ICT-beta              R Uithof WISK-412  _/ \_
Faculty of Science, Utrecht University T +31 30 253 4106 / \_/ \
Budapestlaan 6, 3584CD Utrecht, NL     F +31 30 253 4553 \_/ \_/
http://people.cs.uu.nl/henkp/          M penning@uu.nl     \_/