Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-mirrors-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-mirrors-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E96F09DBD for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 20:55:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42612 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2012 20:55:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-mirrors-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 42578 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2012 20:55:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact mirrors-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: mirrors@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list mirrors@apache.org Received: (qmail 42571 invoked by uid 99); 20 Mar 2012 20:55:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 20:55:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [193.105.142.11] (HELO smtp.ltc.sk) (193.105.142.11) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 20:55:25 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (remedy.wilbury.sk [IPv6:2a01:390:4::47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "janitor", Issuer "Wilbury Consulting CA" (verified OK)) by smtp.ltc.sk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 738158800 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 21:55:04 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F68EEA7.5010002@lutter.sk> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 21:55:03 +0100 From: Juraj Lutter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100411 Thunderbird/2.0.0.24 Mnenhy/0.7.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mirrors@apache.org Subject: Re: openoffice at apache.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 03/19/2012 11:34 PM, Henk P. Penning wrote: > Hi Apache Mirrors, > For http://sk.freebsd.org/ Apache mirror, the disk space will not be a problem, we can allocate more space to our VxFS volume, bandwidth seems to be not problematic as well. Should either of these go over some "reasonable" limits, we will opt-out. -- Juraj Lutter | /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign otis (at) wilbury (dot) sk | \/ - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail http://www.wilbury.sk/ | /\ - NO Word docs in e-mail JID: otis (at) jabber (dot) vx (dot) sk !07/11 PDP a ni deppart m'I !pleH