Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-mirrors-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 18391 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2004 02:49:26 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2004 02:49:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 2619 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2004 02:49:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-mirrors-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 2373 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2004 02:49:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact mirrors-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: mirrors@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list mirrors@apache.org Received: (qmail 2359 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2004 02:49:07 -0000 X-Sasl-enc: 3bI+CyM9NLVCpbHoUHDcIg 1080528554 Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 21:49:11 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time) From: Joshua Slive To: mirrors@apache.org Subject: Re: captg mirror In-Reply-To: <40678283.7040006@captg.com> Message-ID: References: <005c01c41530$5b0f7650$6a01a8c0@gravity> <40678283.7040006@captg.com> X-X-Sender: slive@fastmail.fm@mail.messagingengine.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Sun, 28 Mar 2004, CaptG wrote: > Is it allowed to have mirrors from the same datacenter? I don't see any particular problem with that. They have their own bandwidth allocation and hardware, so they do provide additional resources. Joshua.