www-mirrors mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "HOSTMASTER" <hostmas...@roweboat.net>
Subject Re: apache.roweboat.net
Date Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:15:23 GMT
I can see ur point, but not everyone will be downloading from a high speed
connection like yours. Many of the mirrors that host the apache.org dist are
connected into highspeed fibers, beign that most are ISP, HOSTING FIRMS, and
large schools. Ive talked with my isp and the connection i have can go no
higher with out continious dropped conections, which would be no fun for
anyone regarless of connection speed.
Have you been getting virues threw this list, like users claiming to have
microsoft patches?
Andy Rowe
apachemirror@roweboat.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <chris@UU.NET>
To: <mirrors@apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: apache.roweboat.net


>
>
> On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Erik Abele wrote:
>
> > On 28/09/2003, at 09:51, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
> >
> > > This mirror (at 3am EDT) is quite slow, it appears to be hosted on a
> > > DSL
> > > line... is this good for the apache going-public's experience?
> > >
> > > download example:
> > > 03:48:51 (82.35 KB/s) - `httpd-2.0.47.tar.Z' saved
> >
> > Looks good for me at the moment, but I'll also have an eye on it.
>
> :date
> Sun Sep 28 14:49:29 EDT 2003
> wget of file:
> 14:49:22 (83.58 KB/s) - `httpd-2.0.47.tar.Z' saved [10295639/10295639]
>
> Still only 80kps from a gig-e connected site... slower speed sites are
> nice for tertiary backup, but during a rush/upgrade it will be painful.
>
> With 2 concurrent downloads going the speed drops to:
>
> 18:54:52 (61.00 KB/s) - `httpd-2.0.47.tar.Z?' saved [10295639/10295639]
>
> -Chris
>
>



Mime
View raw message