Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-mirrors-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 65035 invoked by uid 500); 28 Nov 2002 01:34:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact mirrors-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: mirrors@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list mirrors@apache.org Received: (qmail 65016 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2002 01:34:19 -0000 Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 11:34:24 +1000 (EST) From: jason andrade To: mirrors@apache.org cc: infrastructure@apache.org Subject: RE: cvs commit: site/xdocs/dev mirrors.xml In-Reply-To: <5FCE856B804270449E97E3C7744D5D2D025090@exchangeserver.internal.stamina.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Checked: SPAMASSASSIN: This message probably not SPAM X-Spam-Score: -104.4, Required: 5 X-Virus-Scanned: Message: ok X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.9 (www dot roaringpenguin dot com slash mimedefang) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Andrew Kenna wrote: > I wonder whether it would be worthwhile getting all mirrors if they > don't have any objections disclosing what speed their mirror site has to > the internet ? ugh. ok, i can understand wanting this knowledge, but do we really want to see 100+ messages, most of whom are not going to trim the original email, so it's going to be several meg of mail flying about, just for this ? perhaps mailing andrew directly rather than the mirrors list ? and this is going to go on for a weeek as various people catch up to the list and submit stuff... unless there is a cynical view that not that many read/respond to the mirrors list anymore.. regards, -jason [lots of stuff deleted that shouldn't be reforwarded every time]