www-mirrors mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andrew Kenna" <andr...@stamina.com.au>
Subject RE: Mirror Update time
Date Fri, 25 Oct 2002 04:11:47 GMT
That would be unreal, but I guess the question is could that be done without opening up any
holes in apache's source code ? 

Andrew


-----Original Message-----
From: Aaron Bannert [mailto:aaron@clove.org]
Sent: Friday, 25 October 2002 2:04 PM
To: mirrors@apache.org
Subject: Re: Mirror Update time


On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 08:22:43PM -0400, Haesu wrote:
> Hello,
> 	I personally believe that everyone operating the mirror must run
> at least 1.3.26 or above.. I mean it would be better if all the mirrors
> are *totally secure* from any possibilities of exploits, rather than just
> cutting corners with redhat rpm updates that fix the problem w/o upgrading
> completely. Accepted, my opinion may not be 100% correct. But the reason
> for anyone to operate an official mirror is to help apache foundation to
> begin with, and I believe each mirror should be proactive in its
> responsibilities, including security.

It would be neat if we had an automated tool that could collect the
version numbers (and maybe other automatically collectible info) from
each of our mirrors.

-aaron

Mime
View raw message