www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Henri Yandell (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-463) Can UNLICENSE to be added to Category A?
Date Sun, 16 Jun 2019 17:37:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16865093#comment-16865093

Henri Yandell commented on LEGAL-463:

Noting that the Unlicense is not OSI-approved.

This StackExchange link suggests its due to the quality of the license; though I'm not sure
it was ever officially requested:


[This is a vague 3rd reason why something can fail to get OSI-approved:

"(c) the license is problematic for nonsubstantive reasons (for example, it is poorly drafted
or significantly duplicative of one or more existing OSI-approved licenses)"]

Nevertheless, I think it still makes sense to add it. We don't say something must be OSI-approved;
just that it must meet the OSD.

> Can UNLICENSE to be added to Category A?
> ----------------------------------------
>                 Key: LEGAL-463
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-463
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Christofer Dutz
>            Priority: Major
> I've stumbled over some code we would like to use a tiny fraction of in Apache PLC4X.
> The license seems to be very liberal. 
> [https://github.com/bkiers/tiny-language-antlr4/blob/master/UNLICENSE]
> Could you please confirm this is a category A license?

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message