www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kenneth Dilbeck (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-351) Apache 2.0 License use for UML Models
Date Wed, 06 Dec 2017 21:50:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16280977#comment-16280977
] 

Kenneth Dilbeck commented on LEGAL-351:
---------------------------------------

Steve, I have one group of lawyer that interpret Apache 2.0 to be applicable to only source
code executables. Text, diagrams and UML are out of scope for Apache 2.0.  Hence my question
to this group.

> Apache 2.0 License use for UML Models
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-351
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-351
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Kenneth Dilbeck
>
> Is there legal precedence for using Apache 2.0 License mode for UML Models? 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message