www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Romain Manni-Bucau (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-335) What is the category of EPLv2?
Date Thu, 30 Nov 2017 07:38:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16272282#comment-16272282
] 

Romain Manni-Bucau commented on LEGAL-335:
------------------------------------------

Not really Mark since we literally copy the signatures which are licensed AFAIK.

> What is the category of EPLv2?
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-335
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-335
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: John D. Ament
>            Assignee: Chris A. Mattmann
>
> https://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-2.0/
> This is the new version of the EPL, likely also a Cat B.  The Eclipse Foundation is seeking
input on the proposed EE4J (formerly Java EE) project and the issue of license to use has
come up.  This project intends to use a EPLv2/GPLv2+CPE dual license, and with EPLv2 in play
I would like confirmation that there would be no issue leveraging it at least in binary form
similar to today's requirements around CDDL/GPL.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message