www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "John D. Ament (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-319) Clarify the usage of ReactJS
Date Sat, 23 Sep 2017 12:53:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16177782#comment-16177782

John D. Ament commented on LEGAL-319:

MIT is already [Cat-A|http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a] so I'm not sure
what you're asking for [~wohali].  However, you would need to upgrade to v16 of React per
the blog post, for it to be relicensed under MIT (relicensing is never retroactive).

> Clarify the usage of ReactJS
> ----------------------------
>                 Key: LEGAL-319
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-319
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: John D. Ament
> ReactJS is another very popular library these days that is also licensed under Facebook
BSD+Patents license.  Can:
> - Apache projects include the source in a release (my guess is no)?
> - Apache projects depend on it as a compile time dependency in their projects?

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message