Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CE3200CC5 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 20:23:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 2580E166D63; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 18:23:02 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 455F0166D60 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 20:23:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 12415 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2017 18:23:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 12404 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2017 18:23:00 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 18:23:00 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 97281194165 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 18:22:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.481 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.481 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=umail-iu-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HS8fYkpJ1fXw for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 18:22:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f46.google.com (mail-oi0-f46.google.com [209.85.218.46]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 7B1E7627A3 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 18:22:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f46.google.com with SMTP id x187so138514oig.3 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:22:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umail-iu-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=pe0iz4wKTNFO+Je+YnU2NEOoZOqZs2GUqErFVuewk8I=; b=YvpNXPXIG5BkXjbPojYB5Mp8YuYXLOuhIn0c+0BbfY4OU5ym6Fh+N99snuqzlYmy7u G2iK7OGjCu4nNyDS5o9PNr0T8/vnW8fKWFdYEBdSX9ugZYo13BLLvK0AIEfdxrqQF/pE xu4G2t37+YDeD9GMLpir6erKtDqQlznXQRhoRk5U5xSQAacxQgnPLfHlnVe7K8psU0fi UOoRilwZeba+xqQhw1Kd756pJYU1xoDMGGFcDntNSARhRo9iglHZ5DCoQZYkouIwzaph Iw2ZxhinmeMQ+Kp0oosrU7J+w3h7V/xxgAriMm8dSMhPnQnRI6+qcbW3VVijJIeuSu+G +fxQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=pe0iz4wKTNFO+Je+YnU2NEOoZOqZs2GUqErFVuewk8I=; b=XJ16Q9yE/hkLE4XBJa5dg3uVdRwdb8mxqj36dmViD+NZqY8vnTLDrSH6Ob/SACIjLu eXSAOLUiXu0+jxr2OCj+SgGMEIIB5vUNxpyqLJdF1pQCv/OfnuDP8o+IArdgEivG6UVx 0fPSgPsqpwYP4Jj0V57YDOneMPNGoWvkjKTkVTQk1Sp6GTgCB0ZD3cKQGaCy5ZaHXjV2 LGOCpG/myXll8fW2unxb7eoifDpfy34+qeZtkjgsfgkDjJp3J4wNArxjC9HeeqHPdIpb RFVbPln+KAIRIqhWeh0Q/I+B07owWeH559ZFL69xv06WVHB/FcRGXMc57MlqIjYUITV+ Nnkw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111B7m1/hvx/ZpFr1OEJuOCV+R0WxKLuMfkMcnlRAPPIAbRpgcbq zOZFMcB93Gbx3mJ2SwB87JFszSBFFhvY X-Received: by 10.202.175.142 with SMTP id y136mr868163oie.132.1499797371870; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:22:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.73.161 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:22:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Qiang Kou Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:22:11 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Including GPL header files in optional features To: legal-discuss@apache.org, ted.dunn...@gmail.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113cf13a95f3f005540ec9a2" archived-at: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 18:23:02 -0000 --001a113cf13a95f3f005540ec9a2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi, Ted, Thank you for the kind reply, I should be more clear on our situation. The ifdef method doesn't seem to work in our case. In our case, the optional feature is an R package: https://github.com/dmlc/mxnet/tree/master/R-package The R package heavily relies on the Rcpp, which is licensed under GPL >= 2. We want to know if we can keep the R package in our repo since it is optional and won't be in the release. Thanks, Qiang Kou On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Qiang Kou wrote: > Hi there, > > I have a question on including GPL header files in optional features. > > Our situation: (1) one optional feature needs including GPL header files; > (2) this feature is not included in the release. > > Is this OK? > > If this is acceptable, which license header should we use for files of the > optional feature? > > "Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation" or just a normal Apache > license? > > Thanks, > > Qiang Kou > > -- > Qiang Kou > qkou@umail.iu.edu > School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University > > -- Qiang Kou qkou@umail.iu.edu School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University --001a113cf13a95f3f005540ec9a2 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi, Ted,

Thank you for the kind reply, = I should be more clear on our situation.

The ifdef= method doesn't seem to work in our case.

In o= ur case, the optional feature is an R package: https://github.com/dm= lc/mxnet/tree/master/R-package

The R pack= age=C2=A0heavily relies on the Rcpp, which is licensed under GPL >=3D 2.=

We want to know if we can keep the R package in o= ur repo since it is optional and won't be in the release.
Thanks,

Qiang Kou

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11= :42 AM, Qiang Kou <qkou@umail.iu.edu> wrote:
Hi there,

I have a q= uestion on including GPL header files in optional features.

<= /div>
Our situation: (1) one optional feature needs including GPL heade= r files; (2) this feature is not included in the release.

Is this OK?

If this is acceptable, which l= icense header should we use for files of the optional feature?
"Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation" or just= a normal Apache license?

Thanks,

Qiang Kou

--
=
Qiang Kou
qkou@umail.iu.edu
School of Informatics and Computi= ng, Indiana University




--
Qi= ang Kou
qkou@uma= il.iu.edu
School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana Universi= ty

--001a113cf13a95f3f005540ec9a2--