www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.INVALID>
Subject Re: "Modified Apache 2.0 License"
Date Fri, 19 May 2017 09:34:35 GMT
Imo it should not call itself Modified Apache 2.0 License. It should not contain the term "Apache"
in the license name at all.

It might use another name and as first sentence explain that it is based on the ALv2 with
exception of section (e).

Just my personal .02 of course.

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 19.05.2017 um 11:08 schrieb Sean Owen <srowen@apache.org>:
> 
> For anyone wondering what the modification is, it's this addition to section 4.
> 
> > (e) If the Derivative Work includes substantial changes to features 
> > or functionality of the Work, then you must remove the name of 
> > the Work, and any derivation thereof, from all copies that you 
> > distribute, whether in Source or Object form, except as required 
> > in copyright, patent, trademark, and attribution notices.
> 
> What's the proposed problem with this? people can license stuff however they want. Is
the question reusing the license text itself?
> 
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 9:53 AM Felix Meschberger <fmeschbe@adobe.com.invalid>
wrote:
> Hi all
> 
> Just stumbled up this „Modified Apache 2.0 License“: https://github.com/wg/wrk/blob/master/LICENSE
> 
> Is there anything to be done about this ?
> 
> Regards
> Felix


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message