www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
Subject Re: Is it OK to remove MIT header in this case?
Date Fri, 12 May 2017 06:58:27 GMT


On 5/11/17, 1:23 AM, "Justin Mclean" <justin@classsoftware.com> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>> My guess would be:
>> -ASF Header since it is part of collective work.
>> -Comment in file under ASF header: "This file is in Google Closure
>> Compiler Externs format which is a non-copyrightable subset of <Github
>>URL
>> to original source>".
>> -Add to LICENSE: "<path to file> is a non-copyrightable subset of
>><GitHub
>> URL to original source>”
>
>Is this valid way to treat this issue?
>
>Assuming it is:
>- My understanding from this thread is that no ASF header is needed.
>- It also seems a good idea to mention that the original code was under a
>MIT license.

In case it matters, I did have to add the following near the top of the
file in order for it to work.

    /** 
     * @fileoverview
     * @externs 
     */


Thanks,
-Alex


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

Mime
View raw message