www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org>
Subject Re: JRuby bundling LGPL prior to version 9.1.9.0
Date Sat, 20 May 2017 02:16:51 GMT
I’ll get back to you on this, sorry I am away for the weekend. I need 
to do some research in the archives on past precedent. 

Cheers,
Chris




On 5/19/17, 6:29 PM, "Sean Busbey" <busbey@apache.org> wrote:

    Question for VP Legal:
    
    Do impacted PMCs need to pull releases that depend on or release
    artifacts that currently distribute the LGPL tainted versions of
    jruby?
    
    On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Mike Drob <mdrob@apache.org> wrote:
    > Legal,
    >
    > I recently got done working with the JRuby dev team on an issue where they
    > were inadvertently including LGPL code in the jruby-complete jar for
    > versions 9.0.0.0 - 9.1.8.0.
    >
    > I'm not sure if we have a good mechanism for tracking which projects are
    > using/bundling JRuby, but it would be good to let them know that they should
    > consider updating for license reasons.
    >
    > Mike
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
    
    



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message