Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B18200C56 for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 17:52:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 3256F160B8C; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 15:52:48 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 2B6BD160B80 for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 17:52:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 48465 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2017 15:52:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 48450 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2017 15:52:45 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 15:52:45 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 8AE5AC1962 for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 15:52:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.396 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.396 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.796, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vBD-5x7fw3OT for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 15:52:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f182.google.com (mail-io0-f182.google.com [209.85.223.182]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 1ADFD5FBA4 for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 15:52:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f182.google.com with SMTP id r16so111900591ioi.2 for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 08:52:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=vWRpyHT9Kvgqd8Omg4GqZHJ2jSSEp7Q1DOshqbf76lk=; b=eDAHf4Vs3SQ0nWQ/ZNz0gdpTJ0Xrrp99XTd0V0TrHuZGnsyif0SP4yOPXNKSlGhjdg j3mNxbtxyf40BXvC3u5r03UG7iGKRzTpButmC3WxNkZ8svmTYWn7Ei/UvWF6t+fjXWNF mSnVOeJZRoXzZlpbzROC+ngyyLhz6hOytDU0ft/TzfRUSle3XIDG3wj0lSg3yfo3fOuN eExY93woeBVTaVXBuT/5HPIAESCZs7ZJZOF9F0AFxlBJFZN7QbEgEsfkaeEdxk0Hxrs4 0zZq2hbKDMB5cclwHnX1gHRkdoH5QUgWKLkP+zE9EcqwKVPPrNmapBcaBnDLOSo3cO5g xUdg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=vWRpyHT9Kvgqd8Omg4GqZHJ2jSSEp7Q1DOshqbf76lk=; b=HicPNT2qG1zKeyUJzrxG1N0/DswVCSHsK/hTNEExuXdTtoohl4Cz8r6zkZAsokPgF6 flYfoua+iRsB67kSUWY+GasyQ7PFiBpFd3ICnOExX7CM/FuAmQnzsigorfOygJ7cpWOp /keAxap14mmJ2C01LbfrM/EP5EdNlEjHt2W1UdO/tl7oBIRA3+0KEN7BAUCZmLWSULJ3 7iDMLVzgv1RvM3gNyC9TY/zYPxXq+SqcBqqMjgTExExg5lvMv0PQp5gLqH2f/R7C2FyT JBm3cTnjxId81piAsHoy2hv7px5Gfl1ku0Bi78KFlIGgCjjalkyy2ve/4VaJP9iYlyu6 qFWQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/5QWLpYl4YK3MsfipyWmBaWyBSXplR/hYkN4V7pmfTKkemEE/u0 WJtDhxIysXTeJ2hbjTlcJrWSmdXl4KF+ X-Received: by 10.36.112.149 with SMTP id f143mr10900898itc.50.1492185162390; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 08:52:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Zeolla@GMail.com" Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 15:52:31 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Apache Metron (incubating) - licensing question To: legal-discuss@apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f65f08b2785054d226e03 archived-at: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 15:52:48 -0000 --001a113f65f08b2785054d226e03 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi all, I recently asked a licensing question to our dev mailing list and to the general@incubator mailing list . I got some feedback and direction, but it was requested that this be sent to legal-discuss for a more authoritative answer. Please see below for a bit of background and my questions. Thanks! *Background*We have a situation where a portion of code was created for Apache Metron (incubating) on February 8, 2016 which is a plugin for a separate open source project, bro . The code was pushed out on February 15, 2016 by the initial author to the bro community under the 3-Clause BSD license , and some important enhancements have been made to the plugin in that separate community, which we would like to include in our code, while also merging with some recent changes that have been made to the plugin, independently, in the Metron code base. *Questions*1. Is it valid to assume that, as Casey mentioned , these are two separate plugins and we can simply make modifications to our code base to resolve the current multithreading issue? 2a. If we do 1, will this require a line in our LICENSE file as a derivative work, or anything else? 2b. If we cannot do 1, what are our options? Thanks, Jon -- Jon --001a113f65f08b2785054d226e03 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi all,

I recently asked a licensing question to our dev mailing list and to the general@incubator mailing list.=C2=A0 I=C2=A0got some feedback and direction, but it was= requested that this be sent to legal-discuss for a more authoritative answ= er.=C2=A0 Please see below for a bit of background and my questions.=C2=A0 = Thanks!

Background
We have a situation where a= = =C2=A0porti= on of code=C2=A0was created for Apache Metron (incubating= ) on February 8, 2016<= /a>=C2=A0which is a plugin for a separate open source project,=C2=A0bro.=C2=A0 The code was pushed out on February 15, = 2016 by the initial author to the bro community=C2=A0under the 3-Clause BSD license, and some=C2=A0important enhancemen= ts=C2=A0have been made to the plugin in that separate com= munity, which we would like to include in our code, while also merging with= = =C2=A0s= ome recent changes=C2=A0that have been made to the plugin= , independently, in the Metron code base.

Questions
1. Is it valid to assume that, as=C2=A0Casey mentioned, these are two separate plugins a= nd we can simply make modifications to our code base to resolve the current= multithreading issue?
2a. If we do 1, will this require a line in our L= ICENSE file as a derivative work, or anything else?
2b. If we cannot do = 1, what are our options? =C2=A0


Thanks,

=

Jon

--=

Jon

--001a113f65f08b2785054d226e03--