Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12654200C64 for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 15:08:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 10F06160BB9; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 13:08:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 5BB4A160B8C for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 15:08:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 41585 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2017 13:08:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 41569 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2017 13:08:06 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 13:08:06 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C99F01B0FF7 for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 13:08:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.144 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.144 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.796, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ibHxW2eYnN3P for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 13:08:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from resqmta-po-08v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-po-08v.sys.comcast.net [96.114.154.167]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 929825FCBB for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 13:08:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from resomta-po-17v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.241]) by resqmta-po-08v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id 45ced0xuVoI4J45crdwWnC; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 13:07:57 +0000 Received: from [192.168.199.10] ([69.251.90.98]) by resomta-po-17v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id 45cqdWb3oijgR45cqdW5b9; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 13:07:57 +0000 From: Jim Jagielski Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Re: Non OSI approved licenses Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 09:07:55 -0400 References: <0ACD0AAF-BE23-4039-83B7-DD7519A1CBC8@jaguNET.com> To: legal-discuss@apache.org In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <3A0C17C2-F8EB-46B5-8C76-C314CD0D77F3@jaguNET.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfE+NgPsTRnYHYNQE5b3ly6HxXs2iZF/4Oks7jRoanAJByDWidKJsZN9/KQ8WGVVQ0XTt/bMlOyQY19ALg6j4bYSRzQHddsWIZX1bXMwbaWvb8yxnNEjn BObxW60a5WwV8CqvpBD/zkn9nf93d6UHwIrm/6SbzY1+JC6T5mUNtKDg archived-at: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 13:08:08 -0000 > On Apr 28, 2017, at 8:55 AM, Christopher wrote: >=20 > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017, 08:08 Jim Jagielski wrote: > For me, I worry that use of these licenses will undermine the argument = I've made to my employer to stick with the set of widely recognized ones = for our own open source software. That is another incredibly important point. Thx for sharing. If the "outside world" thinks, "Hey, it's ok to use any ol' kind of license even if not OSI approved; look, even the ASF does so" it kind of harms the open source community at large, imo.= --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org