www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Marvin Humphrey (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-301) Attribution for Apache 2.0
Date Sat, 22 Apr 2017 01:38:04 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15979680#comment-15979680
] 

Marvin Humphrey commented on LEGAL-301:
---------------------------------------

I'm not sure what to suggest, beyond that you should read the text of the license, particularly
those sections which contain the word "notice".  I realize that's a trivial answer, but we
can't go much farther than that -- if you need more rigorous analysis, consult an attorney.

In this forum, at most you will receive informal, ad hoc commentary. We do not offer legal
advice. 


> Attribution for Apache 2.0
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-301
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-301
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Eden
>
> Hi, where in the Apache 2.0 license does it indicate that I need to retain attribution
notices (assuming there is not NOTICE file) for binary copies I distribute (but have not modified)?
I intend to attribute regardless but would like to understand exactly where it appears in
the license. Many thanks. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message