www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan Gates (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Resolved] (LEGAL-298) Is SCSL 3.0 license acceptable?
Date Mon, 17 Apr 2017 23:24:41 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Alan Gates resolved LEGAL-298.
------------------------------
    Resolution: Information Provided

Thanks Marvin, that answer tells us what we need to know.

> Is SCSL 3.0 license acceptable?
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-298
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-298
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Alan Gates
>
> Apache Hive includes a jar in its binary distribution that is licensed under SCSL 3.0
(http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/SCSL3.0.rtf).  As this license is not listed on
the "resolved" page we are not sure if this is an acceptable license or not.  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message