www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com>
Subject Is it OK to remove MIT header in this case?
Date Tue, 25 Apr 2017 21:01:33 GMT
Hi,

As part of the build process Flex uses this patch file [1] to 3rd party MIT licensed code
[2]. Part of the patch is removing the MIT license header - should it do this?

Adobe legal was asked (off list) and they come back with the copyright is owned by Adobe,
[3] but IMO it still not clear that ASF policy would allow for the header to be removed. [4]

Any suggestions on how to handle this?

Thanks,
Justin

1. https://github.com/apache/flex-typedefs/blob/master/createjs/src/main/patch/tweenjs.patch
2. https://github.com/CreateJS/TweenJS/blob/master/src/tweenjs/Tween.js
3. https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/132d2d65017befe599e4f5fd2e1b148b35bce81f2eae7a4e0a5501d0@%3Cdev.flex.apache.org%3E
4. https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message