www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Created] (LEGAL-296) Eclipse Distribution License - v 1.0 files in OFBiz
Date Mon, 27 Mar 2017 11:42:41 GMT
Jacques Le Roux created LEGAL-296:
-------------------------------------

             Summary: Eclipse Distribution License - v 1.0 files in OFBiz
                 Key: LEGAL-296
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-296
             Project: Legal Discuss
          Issue Type: Question
            Reporter: Jacques Le Roux


This has been discussed in the OFBiz project and we prefer to ask before taking a definitive
decision.

We read at  http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b

bq. For small amounts of source that is directly consumed by the ASF product at runtime in
source form, and for which that source is unmodified and unlikely to be changed anyway (say,
by virtue of being specified by a standard), inclusion of appropriately labeled source is
also permitted. An example of this is the web-facesconfig_1_0.dtd, whose inclusion is mandated
by the JSR 127: JavaServer Faces specification

My question is:

Can the files under folders at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/ofbiz-plugins/trunk/birt/webapp/birt/webcontent/birt,
all licensed under https://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/edl-v10.php be included in source
form, without modifications, in an Apache (source) release?  It's 160 files and 541 523 bytes
at all. If the answer is yes, are there any legal requirements (i.e. additions to LICENSE
and/or NOTICE file)?

Thanks!




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message