Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87D7200C22 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:59:17 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id E6F87160B68; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 18:59:17 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 3AD76160B4F for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:59:17 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 33508 invoked by uid 500); 21 Feb 2017 18:59:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 33497 invoked by uid 99); 21 Feb 2017 18:59:16 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 18:59:15 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 7016FC0258 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 18:59:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.48 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.48 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ks9Pe6ZdI19n for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 18:59:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ot0-f172.google.com (mail-ot0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 5107C5F613 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 18:59:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ot0-f172.google.com with SMTP id x10so55473194otb.1 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 10:59:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=CSLXwhrQ6n26g59KHhLWtUjxpe6yNeCtdMxJzrOaM2w=; b=BFnmpDBm2F/fa759EXVlSb8/5LuBFDXRABYHWvCjHbcibwfPxb7WRhbjzQhEa4g2/z Q1YEjsIStvvIjX+Q6FR43aOsKgWB2wMWR34w1hPQIkQU7t88NkCj8GB75I98x/v6XU5J i8ff8XH1+1ICwxOLFwEiIhNvb5N7144cB4kcYTKCR+9MQ0pzZb+yy3JSAdAQC+bF58Bo c4+KsNhJG31VhcBasVP1UVR45yhZdcLRtX5Z6eo5F/IW7CUdtDl2R0HmmRSZHdvxId8B kuNJQUpHqQUlJEIAVNJ1x/AgPqG1mBgfg/M4wKYuveZTfXi1l5zIPxiElYXX6EFEw26P QGlg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=CSLXwhrQ6n26g59KHhLWtUjxpe6yNeCtdMxJzrOaM2w=; b=oo4okwhxB7koGu108NlTHlXXvWMwJhPlXP4ap/dWSWurX4AVcj3Pn+q4b8yzTAArN5 xpJEEnsMCthFivroCmXXRj7qUOTl2rfHgidYs2a5opGZvoRl8533yfioc9Eu96I+AnH1 rpC0AgTRsJgDxNcPmkE8gDemTN4x1s6kiCXJvFxZw1jXy7LbewAv+apkx4xTz99fPtpm Id/jlIWINoEN6OU2KJcurf8FsXspN3QyMMdFjJqIRL73dGajvD7tSp9JCbPI+impozeK 8KODNMBSwP4FH/gXgvjsMuVoySmbbXOPpB9ZXLzKpxzhG/NmL1hFwyoI+WE9W1e5OhHX iPOQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nZCe2I0bYyc/I7KWAaQzUOnSRLHc0FMCDujTI2Hor7lLQ1rj4ChuTSh91IJA+kuNwWUk8XmHT+gw+tCw== X-Received: by 10.157.60.241 with SMTP id t46mr16578556otf.224.1487703545946; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 10:59:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: shaposhnik@gmail.com Received: by 10.182.40.5 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 10:59:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Roman Shaposhnik Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 10:59:05 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: qXzNvf2B0PJGkAwDd6XT0iIlLb0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: LEGAL-289 To: "legal-discuss@apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 archived-at: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 18:59:18 -0000 On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 3:38 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > I'll point out that the issue was closed with this comment > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-289?focusedCommentId=15858441&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15858441 > - however it was marked as won't fix, so.. > > I added the comment about checking on the license status after it was > closed. Ah! That makes sense. > I have not received a response, however I also figured it would be > unlikely that I get a response. > > Reading through the license, I think we should start over on analysis, and > come up with something. I agree with the initial notes about BSD-ish, but > as mentioned its seemingly written in layman's terms so its not that easy to > confirm. What's the process for this? Do we need to wait for a new VP Legal to be appointed? From where I stand, Roy's comment (as usual) is the answer: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-289?focusedCommentId=15858365&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15858365 But at the same time I also respect Jim's opinion and others who chimed in. I also, obviously, have my own opinion (stated on a JIRA). Obviously some of this opinions are in conflict. How do we arrive at a resolution? Thanks, Roman. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org